Trademark search for:

SAMUEL GELSTON'S

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2017-06-07 — Application filed
2017-06-10 — Application filed
2017-06-12 — Teas voluntary amendment received
2017-06-14 — Application filed
2017-07-18 — Assigned to lie
2017-07-24 — Preliminary/voluntary amendment - entered
2017-09-07 — Assigned to examiner
2017-09-13 — Approved for pub - principal register
2017-10-04 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2017-10-24 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2017-10-24 — Published for opposition
2017-12-19 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2018-06-19 — Use amendment filed
2018-06-19 — Teas statement of use received
2018-07-12 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2018-07-12 — Statement of use processing complete
2018-07-13 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2018-07-14 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2018-08-21 — Registered-principal register
2022-10-13 — Teas change of correspondence received
2022-10-13 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2022-10-13 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2023-08-21 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2025-03-07 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2025-03-07 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

H J Neill Limited
Liverpool GB

H J Neill Limited
Liverpool GB

H J Neill Limited
Liverpool GB

Correspondent

J. Scott Gerien DICKENSON, PEATMAN & FOGARTY
1500 First Street, Ste 200
Napa, CA 94559
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2017-06-07

Status Date:
2025-03-07

Category:
Alcoholic Beverages

Filing Year:
2017

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.