Trademark search for:

PEACH HARMONY

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2002-03-16 — Application filed
2002-07-02 — Final disposition recorded
2002-12-30 — Paper received
2003-05-05 — Paper received
2003-07-08 — Previous action count withdrawn
2003-07-09 — Letter of suspension mailed
2004-01-08 — Case file in ticrs
2004-07-21 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2004-10-18 — Teas change of owner address received
2005-01-21 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2005-08-04 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2006-02-06 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2006-03-23 — Assigned to examiner
2006-11-30 — Assigned to lie
2006-11-30 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2006-12-05 — Examiners amendment -written
2006-12-05 — Examiner's amendment entered
2006-12-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-12-06 — Examiners amendment mailed
2006-12-12 — Law office publication review completed
2007-01-10 — Notice of publication
2007-01-30 — Published for opposition
2007-04-24 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-10-25 — Final status recorded
2007-12-18 — Application abandoned
2007-12-18 — Application abandoned

Owner Information

COCA-COLA COMPANY, THE
Atlanta , GA

COCA-COLA COMPANY, THE
Atlanta , GA

Correspondent

SCHUYLA M GOODSON THE COCA COLA COMPANY
PO BOX 1734
ATLANTA, GA 30301-1734
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2002-03-16

Status Date:
2007-10-25

Category:
Beers & Non-alcoholic Drinks

Filing Year:
2002

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.