Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Beers & Non-alcoholic Drinks ›
2002 ›
PO ›
POSTNOFF
Trademark search for:
POSTNOFF
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2002-09-12 — Application filed
2003-01-13 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-02-19 — Notice of publication
2003-03-11 — Published for opposition
2003-06-03 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2003-11-15 — Sou teas extension received
2003-11-15 — Sou extension 1 filed
2003-11-21 — Sou extension 1 granted
2004-05-27 — Teas change of correspondence received
2004-05-27 — Teas change of correspondence received
2004-05-27 — Sou teas extension received
2004-05-27 — Sou extension 2 filed
2004-05-27 — Sou extension 2 granted
2004-06-04 — Case file in ticrs
2004-11-03 — Sou teas extension received
2004-11-03 — Sou extension 3 filed
2004-11-10 — Sou extension 3 granted
2005-05-11 — Sou teas extension received
2005-05-11 — Sou extension 4 filed
2005-05-26 — Sou extension 4 granted
2005-08-16 — Teas change of correspondence received
2005-12-03 — Sou extension 5 filed
2005-12-05 — Sou teas extension received
2006-01-09 — Sou extension 5 granted
2006-06-04 — Final status recorded
2006-08-10 — Application abandoned
2006-08-10 — Application abandoned
2007-07-06 — Teas change of correspondence received
Owner Information
ROMAN & PARK, INC.
Los Angeles , CA
ROMAN & PARK, INC.
Los Angeles , CA
Correspondent
Elena Muravina, Esq. Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman, LLP 9601 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 710 Beverly Hills, CA 90210-5288
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2002-09-12
Status Date:
2006-06-04
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.