Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Beers & Non-alcoholic Drinks ›
2005 ›
CA ›
CANEHDIAN
Trademark search for:
CANEHDIAN
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-11-11 — Application filed
2005-11-16 — Application filed
2006-05-17 — Final disposition recorded
2006-05-17 — Final disposition recorded
2006-05-17 — Assigned to examiner
2006-11-07 — Office action issued
2006-11-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-11-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-12-22 — Office action issued
2006-12-22 — Office action issued
2007-06-11 — Teas amendment of use received
2007-06-11 — Use amendment filed
2007-06-11 — Office action issued
2007-06-11 — Office action issued
2007-06-22 — Amendment to use processing complete
2007-06-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-06-22 — Assigned to lie
2007-06-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-07-09 — Final disposition recorded
2007-07-09 — Final disposition recorded
2007-07-09 — Final disposition recorded
2007-07-10 — Office action issued
2007-07-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-07-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-08-01 — Office action issued
2007-08-01 — Office action issued
2007-08-01 — Office action issued
2008-02-27 — Application abandoned
2008-02-27 — Application abandoned
2008-02-27 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Lothringen, Julian
Burlington CA
Correspondent
RICHARD L MORRIS JR ESQ RICHARD L MORRIS JR ESQ C/O 1-800-4-TRADEMARK PO BOX 398538 MIAMI BEACH, FL 33239
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-11-11
Status Date:
2008-02-27
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.