Brandinium

Trademark search for:

MIX WITH FORMULA, JUICE, AND CEREAL

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2008-06-21 — Application filed
  • 2008-06-25 — Application filed
  • 2008-06-26 — Notice of design search code mailed
  • 2008-09-17 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2008-10-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-10-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-10-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-10-29 — Office action issued
  • 2008-10-29 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-10-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-11-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2008-11-10 — Assigned to lie
  • 2008-11-13 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2008-11-26 — Notice of publication
  • 2008-12-16 — Published for opposition
  • 2009-03-10 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2009-09-10 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2009-09-10 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2009-09-10 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2009-10-15 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2009-10-15 — Use amendment filed
  • 2009-11-03 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2009-11-03 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2009-11-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-11-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-11-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-04-08 — Office action issued
  • 2010-04-08 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-04-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-05-10 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-05-10 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-05-10 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-08-19 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2010-11-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2010-11-10 — Office action issued
  • 2010-11-10 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-11-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-12-02 — Office action issued
  • 2010-12-02 — Office action issued
  • 2010-12-02 — Office action issued
  • 2011-06-01 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2011-06-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-06-02 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-06-08 — Data modification completed
  • 2011-06-10 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2011-06-10 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2011-06-11 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2011-07-19 — Registered-principal register
  • 2011-11-16 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2012-03-07 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2013-09-11 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2013-09-25 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2014-03-12 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2014-12-11 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2014-12-11 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2014-12-17 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2014-12-24 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2016-07-19 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2017-03-09 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2017-03-09 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2018-02-23 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2018-02-23 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

DS SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC.
ATLANTA , GA
DS Waters of America, Inc.
Atlanta , IL
DS Waters of America, Inc.
Atlanta , IL
DS Waters of America, Inc.
Atlanta , IL

Correspondent

Julia K. Sutherland Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Suite 8000
233 South Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606-6448

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2008-06-21
Status Date:
2018-02-23
Filing Year:
2008

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.