Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Beers & Non-alcoholic Drinks ›
2009 ›
GP ›
GP ENERGY DRINK
Trademark search for:
GP ENERGY DRINK
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-12-16 — Application filed
2009-12-19 — Application filed
2009-12-22 — Application filed
2009-12-23 — Notice of design search code mailed
2010-03-17 — Assigned to examiner
2010-03-18 — Final disposition recorded
2010-03-18 — Final disposition recorded
2010-03-18 — Final disposition recorded
2010-09-15 — Office action issued
2010-09-15 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-09-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-09-17 — Suspension letter written
2010-09-17 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2010-09-17 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2011-03-18 — Assigned to lie
2011-04-06 — Suspension inquiry written
2011-04-06 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2011-04-06 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2011-09-30 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2011-10-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-10-04 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-10-05 — Suspension letter written
2011-10-05 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2011-10-05 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2012-04-23 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2012-11-13 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2012-11-14 — Suspension inquiry written
2012-11-14 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2012-11-14 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2013-05-13 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2013-05-20 — Suspension letter written
2013-05-20 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2013-05-20 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2013-05-20 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-05-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-11-21 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2013-12-09 — Suspension inquiry written
2013-12-09 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2013-12-09 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2014-01-14 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2014-01-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
2014-01-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-01-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-01-17 — Law office publication review completed
2014-02-05 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2014-02-25 — Published for opposition
2014-02-25 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2014-04-22 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2014-08-21 — Sou teas extension received
2014-08-21 — Teas statement of use received
2014-08-21 — Use amendment filed
2014-08-21 — Sou extension 1 filed
2014-09-06 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2014-09-06 — Statement of use processing complete
2014-09-06 — Sou extension 1 granted
2014-09-09 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2014-09-25 — Final disposition recorded
2014-09-25 — Final disposition recorded
2014-09-25 — Final disposition recorded
2015-02-11 — Office action issued
2015-02-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-02-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-02-13 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2015-02-14 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2015-03-24 — Registered-principal register
2020-03-24 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2021-11-19 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2021-11-19 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Bertil Hoffman
Hout Bay ZA
Bertil Hoffman
Hout Bay ZA
Bertil Hoffman
Hout Bay ZA
Correspondent
JAMES M. MCCARTHY MCDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT & BERGHOFF, LLP 300 S WACKER DR STE 3200 CHICAGO, IL 60606-6709 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-12-16
Status Date:
2021-11-19
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.