Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Beers & Non-alcoholic Drinks ›
2012 ›
DE ›
DESIGNATED ALE
Trademark search for:
DESIGNATED ALE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2012-10-12 — Application filed
2012-10-17 — Application filed
2013-02-11 — Assigned to examiner
2013-02-18 — Final disposition recorded
2013-02-18 — Final disposition recorded
2013-02-18 — Final disposition recorded
2013-07-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-07-26 — Office action issued
2013-07-26 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-08-13 — Examiners amendment -written
2013-08-13 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2013-08-13 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2013-08-13 — Examiner's amendment entered
2013-09-03 — Suspension letter written
2013-09-03 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2013-09-03 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-03-17 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2014-03-17 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2014-03-20 — Assigned to lie
2014-03-20 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2014-04-10 — Suspension inquiry written
2014-04-10 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2014-04-10 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2014-10-06 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2014-10-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-10-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-11-04 — Suspension letter written
2014-11-04 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-11-04 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2015-05-11 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2015-06-01 — Suspension inquiry written
2015-06-01 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2015-06-01 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2015-08-26 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2015-11-27 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2015-12-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-12-01 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-12-27 — Suspension letter written
2015-12-27 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2015-12-27 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2016-07-12 — Assigned to lie
2016-07-18 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2016-08-09 — Suspension inquiry written
2016-08-09 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2016-08-09 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2017-02-09 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2017-02-09 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-02-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-02-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-03-10 — Suspension letter written
2017-03-10 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2017-03-10 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2017-09-12 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2017-10-03 — Suspension inquiry written
2017-10-03 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2017-10-03 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2018-03-23 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2018-03-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-03-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-04-18 — Suspension letter written
2018-04-18 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2018-04-18 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2018-10-23 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2018-11-08 — Suspension inquiry written
2018-11-08 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2018-11-08 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2019-06-27 — Assigned to examiner
2019-07-01 — Application abandoned
2019-07-01 — Application abandoned
2019-07-01 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Neil Sorbie
Correspondent
JULIA HUSTON FOLEY HOAG LLP
Filing Details
Filing Date:
Status Date:
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.
