Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Beers & Non-alcoholic Drinks ›
2015 ›
FR ›
FRUITY FUSION
Trademark search for:
FRUITY FUSION
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2015-02-09 — Application filed
2015-02-12 — Application filed
2015-02-23 — Application filed
2015-05-15 — Final disposition recorded
2015-05-15 — Assigned to examiner
2015-05-15 — Final disposition recorded
2015-05-15 — Final disposition recorded
2015-10-30 — Examiner's amendment entered
2015-10-30 — Examiners amendment -written
2015-10-30 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2015-10-30 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2015-10-30 — Suspension letter written
2015-10-30 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2015-10-30 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2016-05-06 — Assigned to lie
2016-05-11 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2016-11-18 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2016-11-18 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2017-05-22 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2017-11-28 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2018-05-30 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2018-10-07 — Teas change of correspondence received
2018-11-30 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2018-12-01 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2018-12-01 — Suspension letter written
2018-12-01 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2019-06-05 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2019-12-13 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2020-06-15 — Assigned to lie
2020-07-01 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2020-09-21 — Teas change of correspondence received
2020-09-21 — Teas change of owner address received
2020-09-21 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2020-09-21 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2020-09-21 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
2020-09-21 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2021-01-12 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-01-12 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2021-01-12 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2021-02-09 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2021-09-13 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2022-05-06 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2022-11-17 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2022-11-17 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2022-11-17 — Teas change of owner address received
2022-11-17 — Teas change of correspondence received
2022-11-17 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2022-12-08 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2023-04-04 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2023-04-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
2023-04-04 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2023-06-24 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2024-01-19 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2024-09-17 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2025-04-19 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2025-04-21 — Final disposition recorded
2025-04-21 — Final disposition recorded
2025-04-21 — Final disposition recorded
2025-08-05 — Application abandoned
2025-08-05 — Application abandoned
2025-08-05 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Sturm Foods, Inc.
Oak Brook , IL
Correspondent
Joseph T. Kucala, Jr. KUCALA LAW LLC PO Box 547 New Lenox, IL 60451 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2015-02-09
Status Date:
2025-08-05
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.