Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Beers & Non-alcoholic Drinks ›
2016 ›
CH ›
CHIEF JUSTICE
Trademark search for:
CHIEF JUSTICE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2016-08-03 — Application filed
2016-08-06 — Application filed
2016-08-08 — Application filed
2016-11-14 — Assigned to examiner
2016-11-22 — Final disposition recorded
2016-11-22 — Final disposition recorded
2016-11-22 — Final disposition recorded
2017-05-22 — Office action issued
2017-05-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-05-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-06-06 — Office action issued
2017-06-06 — Office action issued
2017-06-06 — Office action issued
2017-12-06 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2017-12-06 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2017-12-06 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2017-12-06 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2017-12-14 — Assigned to lie
2017-12-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-12-15 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-01-02 — Final disposition recorded
2018-01-02 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
2018-01-02 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
2018-03-20 — Exparte appeal dismissed - failure to file brief
2018-04-30 — Application abandoned
2018-04-30 — Exparte appeal terminated
2018-04-30 — Final status recorded
2018-05-01 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
DSWDWK LLC
CINCINNATI , OH
Correspondent
PAUL D BANGOR JR CLARK HILL PLC 301 GRANT STREET 14TH FL ONE OXFORD CENTRE PITTSBURGH, PA 15219
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2016-08-03
Status Date:
2018-04-30
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.