Brandinium

Trademark search for:

EMPOL

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 1953-10-16 — Application filed
  • 1974-08-10 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 20 yrs)
  • 1994-08-02 — Registered - sec. 9 filed/check record for sec. 8
  • 1994-10-11 — Registered and renewed (second renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2003-09-26 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2004-07-16 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2004-07-16 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
  • 2004-09-14 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2004-09-14 — Registered and renewed (third renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2006-03-30 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2007-06-20 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2008-11-07 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2014-11-24 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2014-12-11 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2014-12-11 — Registered and renewed (fourth renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2014-12-11 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - e-mailed
  • 2023-08-10 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2025-02-21 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2025-02-21 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

COGNIS IP MANAGEMENT GMBH
40789 Monheim DE
COGNIS CORPORATION
CINCINNATI , OH
HENKEL CORPORATION
AMBLER , PA
EMERY INDUSTRIES, INC.
CINCINNATI , OH

Correspondent

JOHN P. MURTAUGH PEARNE & GORDON LLP
1801 EAST 9TH STREET, SUITE 1200
CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1953-10-16
Status Date:
2025-02-21
Category:
Chemicals
Filing Year:
1953

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.