Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Chemicals ›
1978 ›
AM ›
AMBERGARD
Trademark search for:
AMBERGARD
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-12-01 — Application filed
2005-12-07 — Application filed
2006-06-05 — Assigned to examiner
2006-06-16 — Final disposition recorded
2006-06-16 — Final disposition recorded
2006-11-09 — Office action issued
2006-11-09 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-11-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-11-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-12-06 — Assigned to lie
2006-12-06 — Law office publication review completed
2007-01-03 — Notice of publication
2007-01-23 — Published for opposition
2007-04-17 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-10-12 — Sou teas extension received
2007-10-12 — Sou extension 1 filed
2007-10-12 — Sou extension 1 granted
2008-04-17 — Sou teas extension received
2008-04-17 — Sou extension 2 filed
2008-04-17 — Sou extension 2 granted
2008-10-17 — Sou teas extension received
2008-10-17 — Sou extension 3 filed
2008-10-17 — Sou extension 3 granted
2009-04-17 — Sou teas extension received
2009-04-17 — Sou extension 4 granted
2009-04-17 — Sou extension 4 filed
2009-11-16 — Application abandoned
2009-11-16 — Application abandoned
2009-11-16 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Rohm and Haas Company
Philadelphia , PA
Rohm and Haas Company
Philadelphia , PA
Correspondent
Stephen T. Falk ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY 100 INDEPENDENCE MALL WEST PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-2399 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-12-01
Status Date:
2009-11-16
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.