Trademark search for:

SUPER FLUID

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1978-02-21 — Application filed
1981-01-20 — Published for opposition
1981-04-14 — Registered-principal register
1986-06-19 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
1986-06-19 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
1986-11-12 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2000-12-18 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2001-04-19 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2001-04-19 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2008-02-21 — Case file in ticrs
2010-10-29 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2010-11-01 — Registered and renewed (second renewal - 10 yrs)
2010-11-01 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2020-04-14 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2021-02-03 — Teas change of owner address received
2021-02-03 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2021-02-03 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2021-02-03 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
2021-02-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-02-03 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2021-10-15 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2021-10-15 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

CONKLIN COMPANY, INC.
Shakopee , MN

Correspondent

Garrett M. Weber, Esq. Moss & Barnett, P.A.
150 South Fifth Street
Suite 1200
Minneapolis, MN 55402

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1978-02-21

Status Date:
2021-10-15

Category:
Chemicals

Filing Year:
1978

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.