Trademark search for:

ECONOFLUOR

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1984-08-13 — Application filed
1984-12-14 — Assigned to examiner
1985-01-04 — Final disposition recorded
1985-07-05 — Petition to revive-received
1985-07-25 — Petition to revive-denied
1985-08-20 — Application abandoned
1985-08-26 — Petition to revive-received
1985-09-13 — Petition to revive-granted
1985-09-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
1985-10-06 — Notice of publication
1985-11-05 — Published for opposition
1986-01-28 — Registered-principal register
1992-01-16 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
1992-04-27 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2005-11-29 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2005-11-29 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2006-03-09 — Assigned to paralegal
2006-03-14 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2006-03-14 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2007-02-09 — Teas change of owner address received
2007-02-09 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2008-06-12 — Case file in ticrs
2020-03-20 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2020-03-20 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

PERKINELMER LAS, INC.
Waltham , MA

E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
WILMINGTON , DE

E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
BOSTON , MA

E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
BOSTON , MA

Correspondent

I STEPHEN SAMUELS SAMUELS & HIEBERT LLC
TWO INTERNATIONAL PL
23RD FL
BOSTON, MA 02110-4104

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1984-08-13

Status Date:
2020-03-20

Category:
Chemicals

Filing Year:
1984

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.