Brandinium

Trademark search for:

PROMAXON

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 1987-11-13 — Application filed
  • 1988-02-02 — Assigned to examiner
  • 1988-02-02 — Assigned to examiner
  • 1988-02-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 1988-04-11 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 1988-06-03 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 1988-06-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 1988-06-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 1988-09-20 — Notice of publication
  • 1988-09-21 — Notice of publication
  • 1988-10-18 — Published for opposition
  • 1989-01-10 — Registered-principal register
  • 1994-02-17 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
  • 1994-07-22 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2008-08-04 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2008-10-15 — Paper received
  • 2008-10-15 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
  • 2008-10-24 — Assigned to paralegal
  • 2008-12-02 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2008-12-02 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2013-05-30 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2018-01-10 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2021-10-15 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2021-10-15 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

PROMAT GMBH
RATINGEN DE
PROMAT GMBH
RATINGEN DE
PROMAT GMBH
RATINGEN DE

Correspondent

SCOTT D. WOLDOW SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP
1055 Thomas Jefferson St., NW
Suite 400
WASHINGTON, DC 20007

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1987-11-13
Status Date:
2021-10-15
Category:
Chemicals
Filing Year:
1987

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.