Trademark search for:

CHIROSCIENCE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1994-04-13 — Application filed
1994-09-09 — Assigned to examiner
1994-09-19 — Final disposition recorded
1995-02-21 — Correspondence received in law office
1995-03-27 — Office action issued
1995-09-25 — Correspondence received in law office
1995-11-08 — Examiner's amendment mailed
1995-11-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
1996-01-05 — Notice of publication
1996-02-06 — Published for opposition
1996-04-30 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
1996-09-19 — Sou extension 1 filed
1996-11-25 — Sou extension 1 granted
1997-01-06 — Use amendment filed
1997-03-04 — Statement of use processing complete
1997-04-07 — Assigned to examiner
1997-04-07 — Assigned to examiner
1997-04-08 — Final disposition recorded
1997-04-29 — Correspondence received in law office
1997-05-19 — Final disposition recorded
1997-06-11 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
1997-08-26 — Registered-principal register
1999-05-11 — Sec 7 request filed
2000-01-19 — Reprinting registration certificate
2004-05-29 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2004-05-29 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

DARWIN DISCOVERY LIMITED
CAMBRIDGE, CB4 4WE GB

CHIROSCIENCE LIMITED
Cambridge, CB4 4WE GB

CHIROSCIENCE LIMITED
Cambridge, CB4 4WE GB

CHIROSCIENCE LIMITED
Cambridge, CB4 4WE GB

Correspondent

PAUL F KILMER GADSBY & HANNAH
SEVENTH FL
1747 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW
WASHINGTON, DC 20006

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1994-04-13

Status Date:
2004-05-29

Category:
Chemicals

Filing Year:
1994

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.