Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Chemicals ›
2000 ›
CE ›
CEOFIX
Trademark search for:
CEOFIX
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2000-02-29 — Application filed
2000-08-01 — Assigned to examiner
2000-08-16 — Final disposition recorded
2000-12-29 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-04-13 — Letter of suspension mailed
2001-07-03 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-10-19 — Approved for pub - principal register
2002-04-03 — Notice of publication
2002-04-23 — Published for opposition
2002-07-16 — Registered-principal register
2007-12-10 — Case file in ticrs
2008-05-12 — Paper received
2008-05-12 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
2008-05-22 — Assigned to paralegal
2008-06-02 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2012-04-11 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2012-05-01 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2012-05-01 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2012-05-01 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2012-05-01 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - e-mailed
2019-12-26 — Teas change of owner address received
2019-12-26 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2021-07-16 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2023-01-27 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2023-01-27 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Analis
Suarlee BE
Analis
B-5000 Namur BE
Analis
B-5000 Namur BE
Correspondent
Arthur S. Garrett FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL 901 NEW YORK AVE, N.W. WASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2000-02-29
Status Date:
2023-01-27
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.