Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Chemicals ›
2000 ›
XL ›
XL 2100
Trademark search for:
XL 2100
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2000-04-27 — Application filed
2000-09-25 — Assigned to examiner
2000-09-29 — Final disposition recorded
2001-04-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
2001-08-15 — Notice of publication
2001-09-04 — Published for opposition
2001-11-27 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2002-03-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-05-27 — Sou extension 1 filed
2002-10-10 — Sou extension 1 granted
2002-10-13 — Application abandoned
2002-11-26 — Teas statement of use received
2002-11-26 — Use amendment filed
2003-11-05 — Fax received
2003-11-18 — Reinstated
2004-01-21 — Statement of use processing complete
2004-01-28 — Case file in ticrs
2004-03-03 — Final disposition recorded
2004-03-25 — Paper received
2004-03-25 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-05-27 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2004-08-17 — Registered-principal register
2009-08-26 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2009-08-31 — Assigned to paralegal
2009-09-08 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2015-03-20 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2015-03-20 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
R. E. Davis Chemical Corporation
Oak Brook , IL
R. E. Davis Chemical Corporation
Oak Brook , IL
R. E. Davis Chemical Corporation
Oak Brook , IL
Correspondent
Joseph J. Jochman ANDRUS, SCEALES, STARKE & SAWALL, LLP 100 EAST WISCONSIN AVENUE, SUITE 1100 MILWAUKEE, WI 53202 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2000-04-27
Status Date:
2015-03-20
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.