Brandinium

Trademark search for:

ARCHITECTURE OF THE SKIN

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2002-08-30 — Application filed
  • 2003-02-06 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2003-02-21 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2003-06-19 — Paper received
  • 2003-06-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-09-24 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2003-09-30 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2004-10-25 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2005-04-29 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2005-11-01 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2006-02-24 — Paper received
  • 2006-03-15 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2006-05-01 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2006-06-13 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-06-13 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-01-09 — Application abandoned
  • 2007-01-09 — Application abandoned
  • 2007-01-26 — Undeliverable mail - no action taken
  • 2007-03-07 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2007-03-07 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2007-03-09 — Office action issued
  • 2007-03-09 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2007-03-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-03-09 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2007-03-10 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2007-03-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2007-03-16 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2007-04-16 — Office action issued
  • 2007-04-16 — Office action issued
  • 2007-07-16 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-07-16 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2007-07-16 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-07-16 — Office action issued
  • 2007-07-16 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2007-07-16 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2007-07-16 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2007-07-17 — Office action issued
  • 2007-08-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2007-08-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2007-08-01 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-08-01 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-08-01 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2007-08-15 — Notice of publication
  • 2007-09-04 — Published for opposition
  • 2007-11-27 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2008-05-27 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2008-05-27 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2008-05-27 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2008-11-11 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2008-11-11 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2008-11-26 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2008-11-26 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2008-11-26 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2009-03-25 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2009-05-27 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2009-05-27 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2009-06-15 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2009-06-15 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2009-11-25 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2009-11-25 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2009-12-08 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2010-05-27 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2010-05-27 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2010-05-27 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2010-05-29 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2010-12-27 — Application abandoned
  • 2010-12-27 — Application abandoned
  • 2010-12-27 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

ACTIVE ORGANICS, LP
LEWISVILLE , TX
Active Organics, Inc.
Lewisville , TX
Active Organics, Inc.
Lewisville , TX

Correspondent

Edwin Flores Chalker Flores, LLP
Suite 1036
2711 LBJ Freeway
Dallas, TX 75234

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2002-08-30
Status Date:
2010-12-27
Category:
Chemicals
Filing Year:
2002

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.