Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Chemicals ›
2003 ›
SY ›
SYNPHOS
Trademark search for:
SYNPHOS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-01-07 — Application filed
2003-07-09 — Assigned to examiner
2003-07-24 — Final disposition recorded
2004-01-16 — Paper received
2004-01-16 — Sec. 1(b) claim deleted
2004-01-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-02-18 — Sec. 1(b) claim deleted
2004-02-19 — Sec. 44(d) claim deleted
2004-03-02 — Office action issued
2004-08-03 — Fax received
2004-08-04 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-08-27 — Amendment from applicant entered
2004-09-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-09-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-09-02 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2004-09-13 — Assigned to lie
2004-09-15 — Law office publication review completed
2004-10-20 — Notice of publication
2004-11-09 — Published for opposition
2005-02-01 — Registered-principal register
2010-07-07 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2010-07-07 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2010-07-07 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2010-07-26 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2010-07-27 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2015-09-04 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2015-09-04 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
SYNKEM
Chenove FR
SYNKEM
Chenove FR
SYNKEM
Chenove FR
Correspondent
Frederick W. Meyers Ladas & Parry LLP 224 S. Michigan Ave. Suite 1600 Chicago, IL 60604
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-01-07
Status Date:
2015-09-04
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.