Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Chemicals ›
2004 ›
DY ›
DYNE-A-PLUS
Trademark search for:
DYNE-A-PLUS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-07-07 — Application filed
2004-07-13 — Application filed
2004-10-24 — Assigned to examiner
2004-10-26 — Examiners amendment and/or priority action - completed
2004-10-26 — Examiner's amendment and/or priority action e-mailed
2004-11-22 — Office action issued
2004-11-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-12-01 — Amendment from applicant entered
2004-12-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-12-06 — Assigned to lie
2004-12-10 — Law office publication review completed
2005-01-19 — Notice of publication
2005-02-08 — Published for opposition
2005-05-03 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2005-09-20 — Sou teas extension received
2005-09-20 — Sou extension 1 filed
2005-10-04 — Sou extension 1 granted
2006-03-29 — Sou teas extension received
2006-03-29 — Sou extension 2 filed
2006-06-29 — Sou extension 2 granted
2006-10-03 — Sou teas extension received
2006-10-03 — Sou extension 3 filed
2006-11-07 — Sou extension 3 granted
2007-02-09 — Sou teas extension received
2007-02-09 — Sou extension 4 filed
2007-05-09 — Sou extension 4 granted
2007-11-04 — Final status recorded
2007-12-19 — Application abandoned
2007-12-21 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Helena Holding Company
Wilmington , DE
Helena Holding Company
Wilmington , DE
Correspondent
STANLEY C MACEL, III ESQ CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP PO BOX 2207 WILMINGTON, DE 19899-2207 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-07-07
Status Date:
2007-11-04
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.