Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Chemicals ›
2004 ›
EP ›
EPD TECHNOLOGY
Trademark search for:
EPD TECHNOLOGY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-11-09 — Application filed
2004-11-15 — Application filed
2005-06-14 — Final disposition recorded
2005-06-14 — Final disposition recorded
2005-06-14 — Assigned to examiner
2005-11-22 — Office action issued
2005-11-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-11-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2005-12-09 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-12-16 — Assigned to lie
2006-01-03 — Law office publication review completed
2006-01-25 — Notice of publication
2006-02-14 — Published for opposition
2006-05-09 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-10-10 — Sou teas extension received
2006-10-10 — Sou extension 1 filed
2006-11-30 — Sou extension 1 granted
2007-02-15 — Sou teas extension received
2007-02-15 — Sou extension 2 filed
2007-05-11 — Sou extension 2 granted
2007-09-20 — Sou teas extension received
2007-09-20 — Sou extension 3 filed
2007-10-01 — Sou extension 3 granted
2008-03-14 — Sou teas extension received
2008-03-14 — Sou extension 4 filed
2008-04-02 — Sou extension 4 granted
2008-12-15 — Application abandoned
2008-12-15 — Application abandoned
2008-12-15 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Helena Holding Company
Wilmington , DE
Helena Holding Company
Wilmington , DE
Correspondent
Stanley C. Macel, III, Esq. CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP PO BOX 2207 WILMINGTON, DE 19899-2207 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-11-09
Status Date:
2008-12-15
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.