Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Chemicals ›
2004 ›
RE ›
RESIZE
Trademark search for:
RESIZE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-11-30 — Application filed
2004-12-08 — Application filed
2005-07-01 — Assigned to examiner
2005-07-05 — Final disposition recorded
2005-07-05 — Final disposition recorded
2006-01-05 — Office action issued
2006-01-05 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-02-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-03-09 — Final disposition recorded
2006-03-09 — Final disposition recorded
2006-09-11 — Office action issued
2006-09-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-09-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-09-26 — Approved for registration supplemental register
2006-09-29 — Assigned to lie
2006-09-29 — Law office publication review completed
2006-11-07 — Registered-supplemental register
2012-10-10 — Teas section 8 received
2012-11-07 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2012-11-08 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2012-11-08 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 - e-mailed
2014-08-19 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2014-08-19 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2015-11-07 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2017-06-09 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2017-06-09 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Avista Technologies, Inc.
San Marcos , CA
Avista Technologies, Inc.
San Marcos , CA
Correspondent
Katherine M. Hoffman Solomon Ward Seidenwurm & Smith, LLP 401 B Street Suite 1200 San Diego, CA 92101
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-11-30
Status Date:
2017-06-09
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.