Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Chemicals ›
2004 ›
SC ›
SCIFLOW
Trademark search for:
SCIFLOW
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-09-22 — Application filed
2004-09-29 — Application filed
2005-04-23 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-04-23 — Assigned to examiner
2005-04-29 — Assigned to lie
2005-05-02 — Law office publication review completed
2005-08-24 — Notice of publication
2005-09-13 — Published for opposition
2005-12-06 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-04-05 — Sou teas extension received
2006-04-05 — Sou extension 1 filed
2006-04-24 — Sou extension 1 granted
2006-09-15 — Sou teas extension received
2006-09-15 — Sou extension 2 filed
2006-10-16 — Sou extension 2 granted
2007-04-26 — Sou teas extension received
2007-04-26 — Sou extension 3 filed
2007-08-01 — Sou extension 3 granted
2007-12-06 — Sou extension 4 filed
2007-12-20 — Application abandoned
2007-12-21 — Application abandoned
2008-01-18 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2008-01-18 — Petition to revive-granted
2008-01-18 — Teas petition to revive received
2008-02-01 — Sou extension 4 granted
2008-06-07 — Final status recorded
2008-08-07 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2008-08-07 — Application abandoned
2008-08-07 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Baker Hughes Incorporated
Houston , TX
Baker Hughes Incorporated
Houston , TX
Correspondent
Stephen A. Littlefield BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED 12645 West Airport Blvd. Sugar Land, TX 77478 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-09-22
Status Date:
2008-06-07
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.