Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Chemicals ›
2007 ›
BU ›
BUILT FOR YIELD
Trademark search for:
BUILT FOR YIELD
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-10-31 — Application filed
2007-11-05 — Application filed
2007-12-18 — Assigned to examiner
2007-12-20 — Final disposition recorded
2007-12-21 — Final disposition recorded
2008-06-24 — Paper received
2008-06-25 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-06-25 — Amendment from applicant entered
2008-06-25 — Assigned to lie
2008-06-25 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-06-26 — Law office publication review completed
2008-07-09 — Notice of publication
2008-07-29 — Published for opposition
2008-10-21 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2009-04-15 — Sou teas extension received
2009-04-15 — Sou extension 1 filed
2009-04-15 — Sou extension 1 granted
2009-10-19 — Sou teas extension received
2009-10-19 — Sou extension 2 filed
2009-10-19 — Sou extension 2 granted
2010-04-20 — Sou teas extension received
2010-04-20 — Sou extension 3 filed
2010-04-20 — Sou extension 3 granted
2010-04-22 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2010-10-21 — Sou teas extension received
2010-10-21 — Sou extension 4 granted
2010-10-21 — Sou extension 4 filed
2010-10-23 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2011-04-21 — Sou teas extension received
2011-04-21 — Sou extension 5 filed
2011-04-21 — Sou extension 5 granted
2011-04-23 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2011-10-21 — Teas statement of use received
2011-10-21 — Use amendment filed
2011-10-21 — Teas change of correspondence received
2011-10-24 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2011-10-24 — Statement of use processing complete
2011-11-15 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2011-11-16 — Law office registration review completed
2011-11-17 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2011-12-20 — Registered-principal register
2014-03-31 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2014-03-31 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2015-02-13 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2015-02-13 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2016-12-20 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2017-09-12 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2017-09-12 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2017-12-20 — Teas section 8 received
2018-01-08 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2018-01-08 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8
2018-09-13 — Teas section 15 received
2019-01-23 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2019-01-23 — Registered - sec. 15 acknowledged
2019-01-23 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 - e-mailed
2019-01-23 — Sec. 15 acknowledgement - e-mailed
2020-12-20 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2021-02-27 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2021-02-27 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
2021-02-27 — Teas change of owner address received
2021-02-27 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-02-27 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2021-02-27 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2021-02-27 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
2022-07-01 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2022-07-01 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Syngenta Participations AG
Basel CH
Syngenta Participations AG
Basel CH
Syngenta Participations AG
Basel CH
Correspondent
Jovan N. Jovanovic The Watson IP Group, PLC 3133 Highland Dr., Suite 200 Hudsonville, MI 49426 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-10-31
Status Date:
2022-07-01
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.