Trademark search for:

LIGHTNING BREAK

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2008-02-01 — Application filed
2008-02-06 — Application filed
2008-05-12 — Assigned to examiner
2008-05-15 — Suspension letter written
2008-05-15 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2008-05-15 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2008-11-15 — Assigned to lie
2008-11-15 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2008-12-03 — Suspension inquiry written
2008-12-03 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2008-12-03 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2009-05-07 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2009-05-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-05-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-05-08 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-05-08 — Law office publication review completed
2009-05-27 — Notice of publication
2009-06-16 — Published for opposition
2009-09-08 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-02-22 — Teas delete 1(b) basis received
2010-02-22 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2010-03-10 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2010-03-10 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
2010-04-13 — Registered-principal register
2016-11-18 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2016-11-18 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Innovative Fluid Systems Inc.
Calgary CA

Innovative Fluid Systems Inc.
Calgary CA

Innovative Fluid Systems Inc.
Calgary CA

Correspondent

REID SCHMIDT 20/20 LAW GROUP
110, 7330 FISHER STREET S.E.
CALGARY, T2H2H8
CANADA

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2008-02-01

Status Date:
2016-11-18

Category:
Chemicals

Filing Year:
2008

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.