Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Chemicals ›
2008 ›
PR ›
PRODIGY ZINLOK
Trademark search for:
PRODIGY ZINLOK
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-11-05 — Application filed
2008-11-10 — Application filed
2008-11-11 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2009-02-05 — Assigned to examiner
2009-02-10 — Final disposition recorded
2009-02-10 — Final disposition recorded
2009-02-10 — Final disposition recorded
2009-03-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-03-16 — Office action issued
2009-03-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-03-30 — Office action issued
2009-03-30 — Office action issued
2009-03-30 — Office action issued
2009-04-21 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2009-04-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-04-22 — Assigned to lie
2009-04-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-05-14 — Final disposition recorded
2009-05-14 — Final disposition recorded
2009-05-14 — Final disposition recorded
2009-05-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-05-28 — Office action issued
2009-05-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-06-19 — Final disposition recorded
2009-06-19 — Final disposition recorded
2009-06-19 — Office action issued
2010-02-04 — Application abandoned
2010-02-04 — Application abandoned
2010-02-04 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Haviland Products Company
Grand Rapids , MI
Correspondent
JAMES A. MITCHELL VARNUM, RIDDERING, SCHMIDT & HOWLETT LLP PO BOX 352 GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501-0352 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-11-05
Status Date:
2010-02-04
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.