Brandinium

Trademark search for:

QUANTALIFE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2009-02-13 — Application filed
  • 2009-02-18 — Application filed
  • 2009-02-19 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2009-05-05 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-05-05 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-05-05 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2009-05-05 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-11-05 — Office action issued
  • 2009-11-05 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-11-06 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-11-16 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-11-20 — Office action issued
  • 2009-11-20 — Office action issued
  • 2009-11-20 — Office action issued
  • 2010-01-26 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2010-01-26 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2010-05-20 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2010-05-20 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
  • 2010-05-20 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2010-05-20 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2010-05-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-05-21 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-05-24 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2010-05-25 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2010-06-29 — Published for opposition
  • 2010-06-29 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2010-08-24 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2011-02-22 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-02-22 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2011-02-22 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2011-02-24 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-08-24 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-08-24 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2011-08-26 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2011-08-26 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2011-08-27 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2012-02-15 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2012-02-24 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2012-02-24 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2012-03-08 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2012-03-09 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2012-08-24 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2012-08-24 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2012-08-27 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2012-08-28 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2013-02-24 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2013-02-25 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2013-02-28 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2013-03-01 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2013-08-24 — Use amendment filed
  • 2013-08-26 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2013-08-29 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2013-09-05 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2013-09-09 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2013-09-10 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2013-10-15 — Registered-principal register
  • 2015-04-21 — Cancellation instituted no. 999999
  • 2015-09-30 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2017-06-30 — Cancellation denied no. 999999
  • 2017-06-30 — Cancellation terminated no. 999999
  • 2017-06-30 — Ttab release case to trademarks
  • 2018-10-15 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2020-06-05 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2020-06-05 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC.
HERCULES , CA
BIO-RAD QL, INC.
PLEASANTON , CA
BIO-RAD QL, INC.
PLEASANTON , CA
QuantaLife, Inc.
Pleasanton , CA
QuantaLife, Inc.
Pleasanton , CA

Correspondent

JAMES R ABNEY KOLISCH HARTWELL PC
520 SW YAMHILL STREET
SUITE 200
PORTLAND, OR 97204

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2009-02-13
Status Date:
2020-06-05
Category:
Chemicals
Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.