Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Chemicals ›
2011 ›
IN ›
INNOLUBE
Trademark search for:
INNOLUBE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-08-08 — Application filed
2011-08-11 — Application filed
2011-08-11 — Application filed
2011-09-10 — Final disposition recorded
2011-09-10 — Final disposition recorded
2011-09-10 — Assigned to examiner
2011-09-10 — Final disposition recorded
2011-09-14 — Final disposition recorded
2011-09-14 — Final disposition recorded
2011-09-14 — Final disposition recorded
2011-10-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-10-19 — Office action issued
2011-10-19 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-10-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-11-16 — Assigned to lie
2011-11-16 — Law office publication review completed
2011-11-29 — Withdrawn from pub - examining attorney request
2012-01-20 — On hold - electronic record review required
2012-01-23 — Electronic record review complete
2012-02-08 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2012-02-28 — Published for opposition
2012-02-28 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2012-05-15 — Registered-principal register
2017-05-15 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2018-12-20 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2018-12-20 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
MERCK KGAA
64293 Darmstadt DE
MERCK KGAA
64293 Darmstadt DE
MERCK KGAA
64293 Darmstadt DE
Correspondent
WILLIAM C WRIGHT EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP 60 E 42ND ST STE 2410 NEW YORK, NY 10165-0011 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-08-08
Status Date:
2018-12-20
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.