Trademark search for:

TRIFLUOROMETHYLATOR

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2011-08-18 — Application filed
2011-08-22 — Application filed
2011-08-23 — Application filed
2011-12-08 — Assigned to examiner
2011-12-09 — Final disposition recorded
2011-12-09 — Final disposition recorded
2011-12-09 — Final disposition recorded
2011-12-28 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2011-12-28 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2012-01-10 — Teas amendment of use received
2012-01-11 — Assigned to lie
2012-01-20 — Amendment to use processing complete
2012-01-20 — Use amendment filed
2012-02-01 — Use amendment accepted
2012-02-02 — Approved for registration supplemental register
2012-02-02 — Notice of acceptance of amendment to allege use e-mailed
2012-02-06 — Law office publication review completed
2012-03-13 — Registered-supplemental register
2017-03-13 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2017-04-27 — Teas section 8 received
2017-05-16 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2017-05-17 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2017-05-17 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 - e-mailed
2021-03-13 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2022-09-23 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2022-09-23 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Catylix, Inc.
Burbank , CA

Catylix, Inc.
Burbank , CA

Correspondent

John D. Carpenter Law Office of John D. Carpenter
225 S. Lake Avenue, Suite 300
Pasadena, CA 91101
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2011-08-18

Status Date:
2022-09-23

Category:
Chemicals

Filing Year:
2011

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.