Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Chemicals ›
2016 ›
EX ›
EXTREME FROM THE MAKERS OF E6000
Trademark search for:
EXTREME FROM THE MAKERS OF E6000
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2016-09-12 — Application filed
2016-09-15 — Application filed
2016-09-15 — Application filed
2016-09-16 — Notice of design search code e-mailed
2016-12-17 — Assigned to examiner
2016-12-19 — Final disposition recorded
2016-12-19 — Final disposition recorded
2016-12-19 — Final disposition recorded
2017-06-14 — Office action issued
2017-06-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-06-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-07-05 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2017-07-05 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2017-07-05 — Office action issued
2017-07-05 — Office action issued
2017-07-05 — Office action issued
2017-07-27 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2017-07-27 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2017-07-27 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2017-09-20 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2017-11-08 — Examiners statement - completed
2017-11-08 — Examiners statement e-mailed
2017-11-08 — Notification of examiners statement e-mailed
2017-11-08 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2017-11-29 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2017-12-06 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2017-12-25 — Suspension letter written
2017-12-25 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2017-12-25 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2018-03-06 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2018-03-06 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2018-03-26 — Teas change of owner address received
2018-03-26 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2018-06-25 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2019-01-31 — Assigned to lie
2019-02-01 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2019-02-23 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2019-09-27 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2019-10-11 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2020-04-29 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2020-06-05 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2020-06-05 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2021-01-26 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2021-02-17 — Examiners request for remand to ttab
2021-02-18 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2021-04-14 — Examiners statement - completed
2021-04-14 — Examiners statement e-mailed
2021-04-14 — Notification of examiners statement e-mailed
2021-05-05 — Teas change of owner address received
2021-05-05 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2021-05-05 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2021-05-05 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-05-05 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2021-07-09 — Office action issued
2021-07-26 — Teas change of owner address received
2021-07-26 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2021-07-26 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2021-07-26 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-07-26 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2021-09-22 — Application abandoned
2021-09-22 — Exparte appeal terminated
2021-09-22 — Final status recorded
2021-09-24 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Eclectic Products, Inc.
Eugene , OR
Correspondent
Sean D. O'Brien Miller Nash LLP 111 S.W. Fifth Avenue, Suite 3400 Portland, OR 97204 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2016-09-12
Status Date:
2021-09-22
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.