Trademark search for:

GRO-BOOST

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2019-07-15 — Application filed
2019-07-18 — Application filed
2019-07-19 — Application filed
2019-09-30 — Assigned to examiner
2019-10-07 — Suspension letter written
2019-10-07 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2019-10-07 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2020-04-28 — Assigned to lie
2020-04-29 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2020-11-02 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2021-06-09 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2021-12-13 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2021-12-15 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2022-07-07 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2022-12-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
2022-12-28 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2023-01-17 — Published for opposition
2023-01-17 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2023-02-16 — Extension of time to oppose received
2023-07-17 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2023-08-29 — Application abandoned
2023-08-29 — Opposition sustained no. 999999
2023-08-29 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2023-08-29 — Application abandoned
2023-08-29 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Neolife International, LLC
Fremont , CA

Neolife International, LLC
Fremont , CA

Correspondent

BRIAN BEVERLY BEESON SKINNER BEVERLY, LLP
ONE KAISER PLAZA, SUITE 750
OAKLAND, CA 94612
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2019-07-15

Status Date:
2023-08-29

Category:
Chemicals

Filing Year:
2019

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.