Trademark search for:

SHOE BANK

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1966-05-16 — Application filed
1986-02-28 — Cancellation instituted no. 999999
1986-06-11 — Cancellation denied no. 999999
1986-06-26 — Cancellation terminated no. 999999
1987-04-10 — Registered - sec. 9 filed/check record for sec. 8
1987-10-03 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 20 yrs)
2006-04-26 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2007-04-26 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2007-04-26 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2007-05-23 — Assigned to paralegal
2007-05-26 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2007-05-26 — Registered and renewed (second renewal - 10 yrs)
2009-02-02 — Case file in ticrs
2012-10-10 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2016-03-02 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2016-03-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-10-03 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2017-03-16 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2017-03-16 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2020-03-16 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2020-03-16 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

ALLEN EDMONDS CORPORATION
PORT WASHINGTON , WI

ALLEN-EDMONDS SHOE CORPORATION
PORT WASHINGTON , WI

SHOE BANK, INC.
BELGIUM , WI

Correspondent

Deborah L. Norman Caleres, Inc.
8300 Maryland Avenue
St. Louis, MO 63105
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1966-05-16

Status Date:
2020-03-16

Category:
Clothing

Filing Year:
1966

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.