Trademark search for:

SKILOM

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2005-12-09 — Application filed
2005-12-14 — Application filed
2006-06-10 — Assigned to examiner
2006-06-12 — Final disposition recorded
2006-06-12 — Final disposition recorded
2006-11-03 — Office action issued
2006-11-03 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-11-08 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-11-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-11-25 — Assigned to lie
2006-11-25 — Law office publication review completed
2006-12-27 — Notice of publication
2007-01-16 — Published for opposition
2007-04-10 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-04-18 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-09-25 — Sou teas extension received
2007-09-25 — Sou extension 1 filed
2007-09-25 — Sou extension 1 granted
2008-04-11 — Final status recorded
2008-08-07 — Application abandoned
2008-08-07 — Application abandoned
2023-01-09 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2023-01-09 — Teas withdrawal as domestic representative received
2023-01-09 — Teas change of correspondence received
2023-01-09 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2023-01-26 — Teas change of owner address received
2023-01-26 — Teas change of correspondence received
2023-01-26 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered

Owner Information

Madshus A/S
Biri NO

Madshus A/S
Biri NO

Correspondent

Jeffrey A Nelson SpyHop Law PLLC
4412 California Ave SW, #16722
Seattle, WA 98116
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2005-12-09

Status Date:
2008-04-11

Category:
Clothing

Filing Year:
1973

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.