Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
1986 ›
KE ›
KENZO JEANS
Trademark search for:
KENZO JEANS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1986-12-31 — Application filed
1987-01-14 — Unresponsive/duplicate paper received
1987-03-27 — Final disposition recorded
1987-08-24 — Unresponsive/duplicate paper received
1987-09-25 — Correspondence received in law office
1987-10-21 — Final disposition recorded
1988-04-18 — Correspondence received in law office
1988-05-24 — Examiners amendment mailed
1988-07-08 — Allowance/count withdrawn
1988-07-22 — Final disposition recorded
1988-11-29 — Correspondence received in law office
1988-12-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
1989-02-24 — Notice of publication
1989-03-28 — Published for opposition
1989-06-20 — Registered-principal register
1995-06-09 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
1996-02-09 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2003-02-10 — Paper received
2004-10-29 — Paper received
2005-05-11 — Teas change of owner address received
2008-08-22 — Case file in ticrs
2009-12-02 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2010-01-22 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2010-01-22 — Review of correspondence complete
2010-01-22 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)
2010-01-22 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
KENZO
Paris FR
KENZO
PARIS FR
KENZO
PARIS FR
Correspondent
JULIA ANNE MATHESON FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & 901 NEW YORK AVE NW WASHINGTON, DC 20001 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1986-12-31
Status Date:
2010-01-22
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.