Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
1989 ›
ME ›
MEPHISTO TRAVEL'S
Trademark search for:
MEPHISTO TRAVEL'S
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1989-09-25 — Application filed
1990-01-24 — Assigned to examiner
1990-01-24 — Approved for pub - principal register
1990-03-01 — Notice of publication
1990-03-27 — Published for opposition
1990-06-19 — Registered-principal register
1996-05-22 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
1996-08-05 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2000-06-15 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2001-01-18 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2001-01-18 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2008-03-15 — Teas change of correspondence received
2009-01-02 — Case file in ticrs
2010-05-14 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2010-05-19 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2010-05-21 — Registered and renewed (second renewal - 10 yrs)
2010-05-21 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2013-11-20 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2016-04-05 — Teas change of correspondence received
2018-04-19 — Teas change of correspondence received
2019-06-19 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2021-10-22 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2021-10-22 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
MEPHISTO S. A.
SARREBOURG FR
MEPHISTO S. A.
SARREBOURG FR
MEPHISTO S. A.
SARREBOURG FR
Correspondent
Fred W. Hathaway Dickinson Wright PLLC 1825 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 900 Washington, DC 20006 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1989-09-25
Status Date:
2021-10-22
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.