Brandinium

Trademark search for:

YVES SAINT LAURENT ENCORE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 1992-12-23 — Application filed
  • 1993-03-06 — Assigned to examiner
  • 1993-03-18 — Final disposition recorded
  • 1993-03-25 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 1993-04-30 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 1993-07-16 — Notice of publication
  • 1993-08-17 — Published for opposition
  • 1993-12-07 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 1994-01-18 — Use amendment filed
  • 1994-03-08 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 1994-03-10 — Assigned to examiner
  • 1994-03-11 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 1994-06-28 — Registered-principal register
  • 2000-02-28 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
  • 2000-05-24 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8 & 15
  • 2000-06-28 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
  • 2000-10-19 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2005-04-02 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2005-04-02 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

LUXURY GOODS INTERNATIONAL (L.G.I.) S.A.
6814 CADEMPINO CH
YVES SAINT LAURENT FRANCE B.V.
PARIS FR
Yves Saint Laurent Fashion B.V.
1077 XX Amsterdam NL
Yves Saint Laurent Fashion B.V.
1077 XX Amsterdam NL
Yves Saint Laurent Fashion B.V.
1077 XX Amsterdam NL

Correspondent

JESS M COLLEN COLLEN LAW ASSOCIATES PC
P O BOX 306
SCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-0806
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1992-12-23
Status Date:
2005-04-02
Category:
Clothing
Filing Year:
1992

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.