Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
1993 ›
GE ›
GEL-CRUSHER
Trademark search for:
GEL-CRUSHER
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-04-12 — Application filed
2004-04-22 — Application filed
2004-11-03 — Assigned to examiner
2004-11-07 — Final disposition recorded
2004-11-07 — Final disposition recorded
2005-05-12 — Paper received
2005-05-12 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-05-26 — Amendment from applicant entered
2005-05-26 — Assigned to lie
2005-06-15 — Suspension letter written
2005-06-15 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2005-10-12 — Assigned to examiner
2005-12-28 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2006-02-17 — Assigned to examiner
2006-07-06 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2007-01-08 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2007-07-09 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-07-10 — Assigned to lie
2007-07-10 — Law office publication review completed
2007-07-23 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2007-08-06 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2007-08-29 — Notice of publication
2007-09-18 — Published for opposition
2007-12-11 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2008-01-08 — Assigned to examiner
2008-06-12 — Final status recorded
2008-08-14 — Application abandoned
2008-08-14 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
ASICS Corporation
Kobe JP
ASICS Corporation
Kobe JP
Correspondent
MICHAEL E ZALL MICHAEL E ZALL TWO YORKSHIRE DR SUFFERN, NY 10901 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-04-12
Status Date:
2008-06-12
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.