Trademark search for:

OINKERS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1989-04-11 — Assigned to examiner
1989-05-22 — Final disposition recorded
1989-11-22 — Correspondence received in law office
1990-02-10 — Assigned to examiner
1990-02-27 — Final disposition recorded
1990-09-26 — Application abandoned
1990-10-15 — Correspondence received in law office
1990-12-06 — Reinstated
1990-12-11 — Assigned to examiner
1991-01-28 — Examiner's amendment mailed
1991-01-30 — Letter of suspension mailed
1992-01-07 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
1992-07-06 — Correspondence received in law office
1992-07-21 — Letter of suspension mailed
1993-01-29 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
1993-07-27 — Application filed
1993-07-27 — Correspondence received in law office
1993-09-27 — Divisional processing complete
1993-10-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
1993-12-03 — Notice of publication
1994-01-04 — Published for opposition
1994-03-29 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
1994-09-29 — Sou extension 1 filed
1994-12-29 — Sou extension 1 granted
1995-03-22 — Sou extension 2 filed
1995-05-05 — Sou extension 2 granted
1995-09-29 — Sou extension 3 filed
1995-10-23 — Sou extension 3 granted
1996-03-30 — Application abandoned
1996-03-30 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

HAGEY, THOMAS
Toronto, Ontario, M5P 3H3 CA

HAGEY, THOMAS
Toronto, Ontario, M5P 3H3 CA

Correspondent

JAMES W MCKEE FAY, SHARPE, BEALL, FAGAN, ET AL
1100 SUPERIOR AVE
STE 700
CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1993-07-27

Status Date:
1996-03-30

Category:
Clothing

Filing Year:
1993

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.