Brandinium

Trademark search for:

MERRY MAX

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 1994-11-16 — Application filed
  • 1995-04-06 — Assigned to examiner
  • 1995-04-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 1995-06-23 — Notice of publication
  • 1995-07-25 — Published for opposition
  • 1995-10-17 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 1996-04-02 — Use amendment filed
  • 1996-07-10 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 1996-07-15 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 1996-09-10 — Registered-principal register
  • 2002-09-05 — Teas section 8 received
  • 2002-09-05 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) filed
  • 2002-10-07 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
  • 2006-06-29 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2006-09-04 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2006-09-04 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
  • 2006-11-01 — Assigned to paralegal
  • 2006-11-11 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2006-11-11 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2008-10-25 — Notice of design search code mailed
  • 2020-04-17 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2020-04-17 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Merry Max Bridal Corporation
San-Chung City, Taipei Hsien TW
Merry Max Bridal Corporation
San-Chung City, Taipei Hsien TW
Merry Max Bridal Corporation
San-Chung City, Taipei Hsien TW

Correspondent

LIN-YUN CHENG PRO-TECHTOR INTERNATIONAL SERVICES
20775 NORADA CT
SARATOGA, CA 95070
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1994-11-16
Status Date:
2020-04-17
Category:
Clothing
Filing Year:
1994

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.