Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
1994 ›
OL ›
OLGA SCOOP
Trademark search for:
OLGA SCOOP
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1994-03-18 — Application filed
1994-08-23 — Assigned to examiner
1994-09-08 — Assigned to examiner
1994-09-14 — Final disposition recorded
1994-09-30 — Correspondence received in law office
1994-11-23 — Letter of suspension mailed
1995-04-25 — Correspondence received in law office
1995-05-26 — Letter of suspension mailed
1995-11-22 — Correspondence received in law office
1996-01-11 — Letter of suspension mailed
1996-02-27 — Correspondence received in law office
1996-03-12 — Correspondence received in law office
1996-04-08 — Assigned to examiner
1996-05-06 — Final disposition recorded
1996-10-25 — Assigned to examiner
1996-11-30 — Assigned to examiner
1996-12-02 — Final disposition recorded
1997-01-13 — Correspondence received in law office
1997-01-30 — Assigned to examiner
1997-03-28 — Office action issued
1997-04-29 — Correspondence received in law office
1997-06-10 — Office action issued
1997-07-09 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
1997-10-14 — Examiners statement mailed
1998-08-04 — Office action issued
1998-10-09 — Application abandoned
1998-10-09 — Final status recorded
1999-02-12 — Exparte appeal terminated
1999-03-05 — Assigned to examiner
1999-08-06 — Assigned to examiner
Owner Information
Warnaco Inc.
New York , NY
Correspondent
MORTON AMSTER AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN 90 PARK AVE NEW YORK, NY 10016 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1994-03-18
Status Date:
1998-10-09
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.