Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
1995 ›
HI ›
HIDDEN DIFFERENCE
Trademark search for:
HIDDEN DIFFERENCE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-06-30 — Application filed
2006-07-07 — Application filed
2006-12-03 — Assigned to examiner
2006-12-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-12-20 — Assigned to lie
2006-12-20 — Law office publication review completed
2007-01-24 — Notice of publication
2007-02-13 — Published for opposition
2007-05-08 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-11-05 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2007-11-05 — Teas change of owner address received
2007-11-05 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-11-05 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2007-11-05 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2007-11-07 — Sou teas extension received
2007-11-07 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-11-07 — Sou extension 1 filed
2007-12-07 — Sou extension 1 granted
2008-04-25 — Sou teas extension received
2008-04-25 — Sou extension 2 filed
2008-05-06 — Sou extension 2 granted
2008-11-07 — Sou teas extension received
2008-11-07 — Sou extension 3 filed
2008-11-10 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2008-11-12 — Sou extension 3 granted
2009-06-08 — Application abandoned
2009-06-08 — Application abandoned
2009-06-08 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Vanity Fair, Inc.
Bowling Green , KY
Vanity Fair, Inc.
Wilmington , DE
Correspondent
HELEN L. WINSLOW Vanity Fair, Inc. One Fruit of the Looom Drive Legal Department Bowling Green, KY 42103
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-06-30
Status Date:
2009-06-08
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.