Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
1998 ›
MI ›
MILLENNIUM CLASSICS
Trademark search for:
MILLENNIUM CLASSICS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1998-12-18 — Application filed
1999-07-12 — Assigned to examiner
1999-07-14 — Assigned to examiner
1999-07-16 — Final disposition recorded
2000-01-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2000-04-05 — Letter of suspension mailed
2001-11-05 — Unresponsive/duplicate paper received
2003-06-03 — Letter of suspension mailed
2004-01-20 — Case file in ticrs
2004-08-09 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2005-02-10 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2005-08-22 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2006-03-19 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2006-09-22 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2007-04-10 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2007-10-16 — Assigned to lie
2007-10-16 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2008-04-17 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2008-10-17 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2009-04-17 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2009-10-17 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2010-04-19 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2010-10-22 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2011-04-28 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2011-05-22 — Suspension letter written
2011-05-23 — Letter of suspension mailed
2011-11-23 — Assigned to lie
2011-11-23 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2012-06-07 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2012-12-11 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2013-06-11 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2013-12-17 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2014-06-30 — Suspension letter written
2014-07-01 — Letter of suspension mailed
2015-01-06 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2015-07-16 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2016-01-22 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2016-08-02 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2017-02-16 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2017-06-06 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-06-06 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2017-07-12 — Assigned to lie
2017-07-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-07-13 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-07-21 — Final disposition recorded
2017-07-21 — Final disposition recorded
2017-07-21 — Final disposition recorded
2018-01-19 — Office action issued
2018-01-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-01-19 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-02-07 — Approved for pub - principal register
2018-02-28 — On hold - electronic record review required
2018-05-09 — Electronic record review complete
2018-05-23 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2018-06-12 — Published for opposition
2018-06-12 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2018-08-07 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2019-03-11 — Application abandoned
2019-03-11 — Application abandoned
2019-03-11 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Bugle Boy Industries, Inc.
Simi Valley , CA
Bugle Boy Industries, Inc.
Simi Valley , CA
Correspondent
DONALD F FREI ESQ WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, LLP 2700 CAREW TWR 441 VINE ST CINCINNATI, OH 45202-2324
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1998-12-18
Status Date:
2019-03-11
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.