Brandinium

Trademark search for:

ONE CLOTHING

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2004-04-29 — Application filed
  • 2004-05-06 — Application filed
  • 2004-09-23 — Preliminary/voluntary amendment - entered
  • 2004-09-23 — Teas voluntary amendment received
  • 2004-11-27 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2004-12-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2004-12-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-03-19 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2005-05-31 — Office action issued
  • 2005-05-31 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-06-15 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2005-06-22 — Suspension letter written
  • 2005-06-22 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2005-07-21 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2005-12-23 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2006-03-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2006-07-20 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2007-02-01 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2007-02-01 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-08-28 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-02-28 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-08-28 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2009-03-03 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2009-09-03 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-09-10 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2009-09-30 — Office action issued
  • 2009-09-30 — Office action issued
  • 2009-09-30 — Office action issued
  • 2010-03-31 — Office action issued
  • 2010-03-31 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2010-03-31 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-03-31 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2010-04-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-04-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-04-01 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-04-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2010-04-20 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2010-05-03 — Withdrawn from pub otqr request
  • 2010-05-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-05-14 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2010-05-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-05-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-05-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-05-19 — Office action issued
  • 2010-05-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-06-03 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2010-06-07 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2010-07-13 — Published for opposition
  • 2010-07-13 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2010-09-07 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2011-03-07 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2011-03-07 — Use amendment filed
  • 2011-03-21 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2011-03-22 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2011-03-25 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2011-03-28 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2011-03-29 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2011-05-03 — Registered-principal register
  • 2016-05-03 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2017-03-17 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2017-12-08 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2017-12-08 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

O & K, Inc.
Los Angeles , CA
O & K, Inc.
Los Angeles , CA
O & K, Inc.
Los Angeles , CA

Correspondent

WILLIAM J SEITER Seiter Legal Studio
2500 Broadway, Bldg F, Suite F-125
Santa Monica, CA 90404
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-04-29
Status Date:
2017-12-08
Category:
Clothing
Filing Year:
1998

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.