Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
1998 ›
WO ›
WOOLY BULLY WEAR
Trademark search for:
WOOLY BULLY WEAR
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1998-04-03 — Application filed
1998-10-27 — Assigned to examiner
1998-11-04 — Final disposition recorded
1998-12-29 — Examiner's amendment mailed
1999-01-15 — Letter of suspension mailed
2003-09-11 — Case file in ticrs
2004-11-11 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2005-05-25 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2005-12-14 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2005-12-16 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2005-12-16 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2006-07-31 — Final disposition recorded
2006-07-31 — Final disposition recorded
2007-01-31 — Office action issued
2007-02-28 — Assigned to lie
2007-02-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-02-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-03-22 — Office action issued
2007-03-22 — Office action issued
2007-09-24 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2007-09-24 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2008-01-31 — Exparte appeal dismissed - failure to file brief
2008-02-01 — Exparte appeal terminated
2008-03-17 — Exparte appeal terminated
2008-03-17 — Application abandoned
2008-03-17 — Final status recorded
2008-05-19 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Howard Davis
Breckenridge , CO
Correspondent
VAREN C BELAIR PATTON BOGGS LLP 2001 ROSS AVE STE 3000 DALLAS, TX 75201 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1998-04-03
Status Date:
2008-03-17
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.