Trademark search for:

CAMA SOL

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1999-08-10 — Application filed
1999-12-02 — Assigned to examiner
1999-12-16 — Final disposition recorded
2000-03-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2000-05-09 — Office action issued
2000-07-21 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2000-11-07 — Examiners statement mailed
2001-10-10 — Exparte appeal terminated
2001-11-01 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2001-11-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2002-05-15 — Notice of publication
2002-06-04 — Published for opposition
2002-08-27 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2003-01-24 — Paper received
2003-01-24 — Use amendment filed
2003-01-24 — Statement of use processing complete
2003-04-16 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2003-06-10 — Registered-principal register
2007-10-11 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-11-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
2008-06-02 — Case file in ticrs
2009-03-10 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2009-03-10 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2010-01-16 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2010-01-16 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

SALIENT GROWTH DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED
On Lok Tsuen, Fanling, N.T. HK

SALIENT GROWTH DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED
On Lok Tsuen, Fanling, N.T. HK

SALIENT GROWTH DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED
On Lok Tsuen, Fanling, N.T. HK

Correspondent

Cory M. Amron Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
P.O. Box 2255
IPLaw@Vorys
Columbus, OH 43216-2255

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1999-08-10

Status Date:
2010-01-16

Category:
Clothing

Filing Year:
1999

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.