Brandinium

Trademark search for:

BRONX WWW.BRONXSHOES.COM X

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2001-04-18 — Application filed
  • 2001-08-09 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2001-08-10 — Examiner's amendment mailed
  • 2001-08-13 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2001-11-28 — Notice of publication
  • 2001-12-18 — Published for opposition
  • 2002-03-12 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2002-09-12 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2002-09-12 — Use amendment filed
  • 2002-09-28 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2002-10-02 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2002-11-13 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2003-05-13 — Office action issued
  • 2003-05-13 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-06-03 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2003-06-17 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2003-08-19 — Registered-principal register
  • 2007-10-24 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2007-10-24 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2007-10-24 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2010-03-27 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2010-03-27 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

G.H. DIJKMANS BEHEER BV
NS Waalwijk NL
G.H. DIJKMANS BEHEER BV
5144 NS WAALWIJK NL
Dijkmans Schoenen B.V.
5171 PS Kaatsheuvel, NL NL
Dijkmans Schoenen B.V.
5171 PS Kaatsheuvel, NL NL

Correspondent

WENDY BOLDT COHEN BLACKWELL SANDERS LLP
720 OLIVE ST
SUITE 2400
ST. LOUIS, MO 63101

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2001-04-18
Status Date:
2010-03-27
Category:
Clothing
Filing Year:
2000

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.