Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2000 ›
MO ›
MORE CHI
Trademark search for:
MORE CHI
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2000-04-17 — Application filed
2000-09-21 — Assigned to examiner
2000-10-05 — Final disposition recorded
2001-04-02 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-05-23 — Approved for pub - principal register
2001-08-15 — Notice of publication
2001-09-04 — Published for opposition
2001-09-27 — Extension of time to oppose received
2002-09-17 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2002-10-17 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2003-05-05 — Paper received
2004-03-23 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2004-04-05 — Teas change of correspondence received
2004-06-22 — Case file in ticrs
2004-09-20 — Sou extension 1 filed
2004-09-20 — Sou extension 1 granted
2004-09-22 — Paper received
2005-03-21 — Paper received
2005-03-21 — Sou extension 2 filed
2005-03-21 — Sou extension 2 granted
2005-09-23 — Sou teas extension received
2005-09-23 — Sou extension 3 filed
2005-12-23 — Sou extension 3 granted
2006-03-21 — Sou teas extension received
2006-03-21 — Sou extension 4 filed
2006-04-11 — Sou extension 4 granted
2006-09-24 — Final status recorded
2006-11-29 — Application abandoned
2006-11-29 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
More Chi Productions, Inc.
New York , NY
More Chi Productions, Inc.
New York , NY
Correspondent
LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC 866 UNITED NATIONS PLZ NEW YORK, NY 10017 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2000-04-17
Status Date:
2006-09-24
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.