Trademark search for:

PUBLICITY WHORE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2001-08-13 — Application filed
2001-09-20 — Assigned to examiner
2001-10-04 — Final disposition recorded
2002-03-29 — Sec. 1(b) claim added
2002-03-29 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-05-28 — Final disposition recorded
2002-05-29 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-05-30 — Sec. 1(a) claim deleted
2002-05-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-06-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
2002-06-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
2002-06-26 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2002-10-18 — Assigned to examiner
2002-12-11 — Notice of publication
2002-12-31 — Published for opposition
2003-03-25 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2003-08-27 — Fax received
2003-09-15 — Teas change of correspondence received
2003-09-24 — Teas statement of use received
2003-09-24 — Use amendment filed
2003-09-24 — Statement of use processing complete
2003-10-15 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2003-10-15 — Assigned to examiner
2003-12-09 — Registered-principal register
2007-05-30 — Case file in ticrs
2010-07-17 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2010-07-17 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

PUBLICITY WHORE
SHERMAN OAKS , CA

PUBLICITY WHORE
SHERMAN OAKS , CA

PUBLICITY WHORE
SHERMAN OAKS , CA

Correspondent

CRAIG MARKLEY PUBLICITY WHORE
8205 SANTA MONICA BL #1-222
WEST HOLLYWOOD, CA 90046
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2001-08-13

Status Date:
2010-07-17

Category:
Clothing

Filing Year:
2001

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.