Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2002 ›
FL ›
FLEX-TO-FIT
Trademark search for:
FLEX-TO-FIT
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-03-02 — Application filed
2006-03-08 — Application filed
2006-07-29 — Assigned to examiner
2006-07-31 — Final disposition recorded
2006-07-31 — Final disposition recorded
2007-02-05 — Paper received
2007-02-05 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-03-13 — Assigned to lie
2007-03-14 — Amendment from applicant entered
2007-04-02 — Suspension letter written
2007-04-02 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2007-10-04 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2007-10-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-10-18 — Law office publication review completed
2007-10-31 — Notice of publication
2007-11-20 — Published for opposition
2008-02-12 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2008-08-12 — Sou extension 1 filed
2008-08-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2008-08-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2008-08-22 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2008-08-22 — Petition to revive-granted
2008-08-22 — Teas petition to revive received
2008-09-09 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2008-09-09 — Sou extension 1 granted
2009-03-16 — Application abandoned
2009-03-16 — Application abandoned
2009-03-16 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Maidenform, Inc.
New York , NY
Maidenform, Inc.
New York , NY
Correspondent
Lawrence E. Apolzon Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C. 866 United Nations Plaza New York, NY 10017 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-03-02
Status Date:
2009-03-16
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.