Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2003 ›
PE ›
PEANUT SHELL
Trademark search for:
PEANUT SHELL
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-03-05 — Application filed
2003-08-25 — Assigned to examiner
2003-08-29 — Examiner's amendment mailed
2003-09-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-10-15 — Notice of publication
2003-11-04 — Published for opposition
2004-01-27 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2004-06-07 — Teas statement of use received
2004-06-07 — Use amendment filed
2004-06-14 — Statement of use processing complete
2004-06-15 — Assigned to examiner
2004-06-28 — Final disposition recorded
2004-08-11 — Paper received
2004-08-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-08-31 — Amendment from applicant entered
2004-10-13 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2004-10-15 — Assigned to lie
2005-01-27 — Law office registration review completed
2005-05-10 — Registered-principal register
2007-06-06 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2008-01-08 — Teas change of correspondence received
2008-01-08 — Teas change of owner address received
2008-01-08 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2011-12-16 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2011-12-16 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
GOO-GA STYLE, INC.
Pleasanton , CA
Joyce, Diane
Acton , MA
Joyce, Diane
Acton , MA
Joyce, Diane
Acton , MA
Correspondent
BRUCE PIONTKOWSKI ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY 80 NORTH FIRST STREET SAN JOSE, CA 95113 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-03-05
Status Date:
2011-12-16
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.